| DIFFLOCK.com |
VISIT OUR ONLINE SHOP! |
Not all doom and gloom for SUVs despite pressure from green lobby
By Simon Ward-Hastelow
Published: 19th Jan 2007
Original article: http://www.difflock.com/magazine/4x4_News/Not_all_doom_and_gloom_for_SUVs_despite_pressure_from_green_lobby.shtml
|
|
The
debate about the suitability of Sports Utility Vehicles (SUVs) for everyday use
has become increasingly heated over recent months, fuelled by negative
publicity about emissions from cars perceived to be ‘gas-guzzlers’. However,
new analysis by EurotaxGlass’s, publishers of the Glass’s Guide to Used Car
Values, indicates that this has had a negligible impact on the registrations
and residual values of prestige-brand SUVs – those vehicles often referred to
as ‘Chelsea Tractors’ by opponents.
“Dealerships
have not been reporting any meaningful drop-off in demand for prestige SUVs, with
sales of new and used examples currently in line with what we saw at the same
point last year,” explains Richard Crosthwaite, Prestige Car Editor at
EurotaxGlass’s.
“Given
the investment required to purchase and run this type of vehicle, the scale of
the proposed increases in Congestion Charge penalties and the new road fund
duty are unlikely to impact sales significantly. While owners may have a
concern about running costs, this is more likely to result in an ever-higher
proportion of diesel models being sold compared to petrol, rather than a
migration of buyers away from the sector as a whole.”
Sales
of new prestige SUVs for the 11-month period up to December 2006 topped 51,667,
representing an 7 per cent increase over the same period in 2005, and 20 per
cent more than in 2004 [see Table 2, below]. Crosthwaite continues, “Looking
forward, the rapid rise of new car sales in this sector over the past few years
will probably mean there will be a natural levelling-off, or even a slight
drop, in prestige SUV sales as demand naturally becomes satisfied. However, ecological
concerns will not drive down registrations in the way that many people
currently think.”
Residual values remain strong
There
is little prospect of a dramatic fall in residual values within the prestige
SUV segment, suggests Crosthwaite.
“The
recent increases in rates of depreciation for prestige SUVs are only slightly
worse than those seen in the ‘Prestige Large’ segment [BMW 5 series,
Mercedes-Benz E Class etc], and are certainly nothing unusual considering the
growth in used car supply following record sales in the segment over recent
years.”
Residual
values for this type of vehicle have come back from being the best in the
market, down to more realistic levels. “This is due to a higher number of used
examples now available, something that will only be boosted by the arrival of
more new models, such as the Audi Q7. However, it should be remembered that
the values of prestige SUVs are still among the strongest in the market, and the
modest further falls in values expected for these vehicles during 2007 will
simply attract more buyers to the sector.”
Crosthwaite
adds, “People buy prestige SUVs for their desirability, as well as their
perceived practicality and safety. Cost is
not a critical issue in this
segment. Despite the negative media coverage, there is still no other
comparably desirable niche sector for these buyers to migrate into. I believe
it is unlikely that many buyers will move into conventional vehicles which they
think are less safe or less practical simply to placate the anti-SUV lobby.”
SUV values set to suffer more in the volume market
While
rates of depreciation for prestige SUVs are unlikely to fall dramatically during
2007, EurotaxGlass’s says the values of volume-brand models will not be so
resilient. “There will be a further sizeable influx of mid-sized SUVs from the
volume-brand manufacturers this year, yet there is little to suggest that there
will be a commensurate uplift in demand necessary to bolster residuals over the
medium term,” adds Crosthwaite.
Table 1: Sample trade values for
one-year-old prestige SUVs
|
(Assumes all models have automatic
gearbox) |
Dec 2005
(2004 ’54-plate) |
Dec 2006
(2005 ’55-plate) |
|
BMW X5 3.0D Sport |
£34,100 (80%) |
£32,600 (75%) |
|
Mercedes ML 270 CDI (old shape) |
£24,300 (68%) |
£22,950 (63%) |
|
Range Rover 3.0 TD6 SE |
£31,000 (68%) |
£30,100 (66%) |
|
Porsche Cayenne 4.5S |
£39,425 (80%) |
£36,325 (74%) |
Table 2: Pattern of new prestige SUV
sales since 2004
| |
11 months up to December
2004 |
11 months up to December
2005 |
11 months up to December
2006 |
|
Lexus RX |
4,432 |
4,260 |
4,157 |
|
BMW X5 |
7,905 |
9,717 |
5,760 |
|
Mercedes ML |
5,006 |
3,158 |
6,060 |
|
Porsche Cayenne |
2,697 |
2,384 |
1,492 |
|
Range Rover |
6,272 |
4,283 |
4,806 |
|
Range Rover Sport |
0 |
5,679 |
9,402 |
|
Land Rover
Discovery |
10,335 |
12,282 |
12,191 |
|
Volvo XC90 |
6,456 |
6,330 |
5,026 |
|
Audi Q7 |
0 |
0 |
2,773 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Total |
43,103 |
48,093
(+11.6% on 2004) |
51,667
(+7.4% on 2005; +19.9% on 2004) |
© DIFFLOCK.com | info@difflock.com | www.difflock.com
|